In Creative Terms…

November 30, 2007

GOP YouTube Debates a doozy.

Filed under: politics — Tags: , , , , , , , — Husain @ 8:22 am

Just a couple days ago the Republicans had their very first YouTube debate on CNN, and boy did they go after each other.

Numerous heated exchanges were the highlight of the debate, with McCain and Romney battling it out over torture and Romney and Giuliani duking it out over ’sanctuary mansions’ and the claim that Romney employed illegal immigrants.

Two people stood out of the debate and the rest made me cringe. Huckabee is a great talker and is easy to like, even though I don’t totally agree with his policies the way he talks makes me understand why he thinks the way he does. The others, like Mitt Romney, just rub me the wrong way and make it seem like they’re ‘double talking.’ Romney’s response to whether he supports homosexuals serving openly in the military was one such example.

Another one that stood out was Ron Paul. He seemed like the only thinker at the debate and he had the best points and arguments in my view.

The Republican side is a mixed bag to me, one on hand there’s candidates like the flip flopping Romney, Bush #2(McCain), and The One Who Relies on New York(Giuliani) and then there’s Huckabee and Paul.  I would not be surprised to see either pick up the nomination, especially since they’re the only ones who performed well at the debate. Well, at least in my eyes.

By far, the worst showing was by Romney. Not only for the attacks by his opponents, which he didn’t defend well. Not only for his constant flip flopping. Not only for his response to the homosexuals in the military question. But also for how he answered the question about black on black crime in urban America: black people just need better parents.

Yes, that’s essentially what he said, and honestly… it’s absurd that he thinks that. Maybe he should have listened one of the twenty times Giuliani explained how he lowered the crime rate in New York City.

November 8, 2007

The Mobile Market

Filed under: mobile phones — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — Husain @ 9:09 pm

The mobile phone industry intrigues me a great deal, at least in America. In most countries around the world you can choose any phone you want from any phone manufacturer you want. Go ahead, purchase several Nokia phones in a row. Or never get stuck with a Kyocera ever again.

In America, we are stuck with limited choice. Wait, limited choice in America? The home of the free? American cellular carriers are a stubborn bunch that are holding this country back in the mobile market.

Imagine this: You need a new cell phone. Your old phone is really scratched up, glitching constantly and has a cracked screen. You walk into a shop that sells mobile phones and looks for one that fits your needs. You head on home and pop in your SIM card(the identity chip that houses your cell phone number and even contacts in the mobile world) and start using your new phone immediately. No upgrading, no jumping through contract loop holes, nothing.

Well, we can’t do that here. You can, but you have to know where to look to buy an unlocked GSM phone. GSM is just the type of phone, essentially it means it takes SIM cards and there’s a lot about frequencies and such things, but oh well. Two of the Big Four cellular carriers in America use SIM cards: T-Mobile and AT&T. Go import a phone from Europe and pop in your SIM card and presto a working cell phone that’s probably going to be better than the stuff they give you.

The other two, Sprint and Verizon, use an older technology that doesn’t involve SIM cards. Why? I don’t know. Probably to hamstring you into coming to them to upgrade and whatnot.

I’m hoping that somehow… someway… maybe Google’s ‘Android’ and the Open Handset Alliance (Google is creating a new platform for mobile phones with a bunch of the big mobile phone companies to do stuff you can do on your computer) can change things.

We need to move and follow Europe. I want choice when I buy a new mobile phone. I don’t want to pick between a couple phones that aren’t that great. If I want the new Samsung Juke and I’m an AT&T or T-Mobile customer then damnit I want the Samsung Juke, not some alternative.

We need to open up. I know it makes them more money to limit our choices and sometimes forces people to switch carriers (hello iPhone, how ya doin’?), but we need it. I saw this example in the newspaper a couple days ago, but imagine if you bought a computer and found out you could only use Comcast as your Internet Service Provider. Or you bought a laptop and you can only use NetZero. How many people would be overwhelmed with anger? What if you bought a brand new spankin’ HDTV and found you can only have Dish Network programming and nothing else? No Comcast, no DirecTV, just Dish?

But of course none of this will change soon. The companies have started to do something about it (Open Handset Alliance), but so do the consumers. We want choice. Not limited choice. Freedom would be the keyword here, mobile freedom.

And just for kicks, I’ll rank the mobile phone manufacturers.

1. Samsung – They continually pack a lot of features into their slim phones and their built quality isn’t too bad either, only thing is their phones carry hefty price tags a lot of the time.

2. Nokia – The world’s leader in mobile phones is that because of their consistency. They rarely strike out big with a phone and always have good balance between affordable phones and higher end beasts that would benefit most people. Too bad about the N-Gage though.

3. LG – Life’s always Good with LG, they crank out some great phones but they normally go unnoticed and don’t make as much noise as some of the other companies. Although it’s probably a good thing their phones do all the talking (LG Chocolate comes to mind, easily one of the more popular phones in America now).  Hopefully they can ride the momentum of the LG and keep it going with future mobiles.

4. Sony Ericsson – They seem to love their tiny brick phones that either draw on two of Sony’s key products: Walkman and Cybershot. They have some of the better camera phones and music phones out there. Their interfaces aren’t the best though and their phone-PC connectivity software can sometimes be confusing however.

5. Motorola – All I have to say is the over-hyped Razr has carried them so far. Their interfaces aren’t the best and they’ve replicated that thing to many times in other forms (Rizr, Slzr, whatevzr else that ends in zr) and they just aren’t that great.

State of Emergency

Filed under: politics, world events, world news — Tags: , , , , — Husain @ 7:26 am

Pakistan is under a state of emergency. Lawyers are being locked up. Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s supporters are protesting and being arrested and beaten for it.

A state of emergency. Why?

Well, Musharraf will tell you that the bombings that have killed many people in Pakistan are to blame. It’s just too dangerous with Al Qaeda and the Taliban around causing trouble! Not to mention some of Bhutto’s followers stirring up additional trouble.

That’s not it though, nope… it just doesn’t feel right. I mean, the supreme court of Pakistan was supposed to weigh in on the controversial way he won Pakistan’s recent election (98% of the vote… how many people receive 98% of a vote in a democracy?). Is it a mere coincidence that a state of emergency was declared and they can’t convene and weigh in on the election?

Let’s just hope stability is brought back to Pakistan. A destabilized Pakistan allows Al Qaeda and even the hidden Taliban to grow in the country and gather support. Oh, and it kind of takes everyone’s mind off of Iran. Yeah, remember them? Yeah, well Iran now has 3,000 centrifuges up and running. Centrifuges are machines that are used to enrich uranium. Mhm.

Oh, and Pakistan has around 50 nukes in their arsenal. Imagine if Pakistan were to fall down the gutter even more. Could some radical get their hands on a nuke? Could the military take over the country and possibly get into things with India? Imagine if a nuke from Pakistan hit India. India happens to be our ally, by the way, which means a world conflict could occur.

These are just possible outcomes of what could happen here. We’re in a tense time. Let’s hope we can help Pakistan restore some order.

November 1, 2007

Democratic Debates and Pakistan

Filed under: politics, world news — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — Husain @ 7:19 am

Debating Democrats

On Tuesday the Democrats were at Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA  with another debate in which many people were expecting fireworks. Prior to the debate Senator Barack Obama said he’d be getting more aggressive with Senator Hillary Clinton and did he deliver.

Not only did he deliver, but Senator John Edwards seemed to be the most aggressive one on stage on Tuesday night. Although he seemed to be going too far at times, sometimes going after her character itself. It was important for Clinton to get attacked a bit that night, and especially important for Obama and Edwards, but as Governor Bill Richardson put it, it seemed like they were just attacking her character and she may have won some sympathy votes.

As for who won the debate, I believe Obama had the best performance. He attacked Clinton but didn’t attack her too much, which he needed to do to show that he can stand up when he needs to. Clinton stumbled when confronted with the issue about drivers licenses for illegal immigrants, which is a horrible idea by the way.

I really do wish that Joe Biden  had a better chance of being the Democratic nominee, but it doesn’t look good. Though he should be considered by everyone in about sixty four days, I heard at least three times someone say “I agree with Joe,” or “Joe is right.” He really hit the head with one specific thing though…

Pakistan is the biggest threat to the United States… not Iran.

Joe Biden hit the head when he said that. Iran does not have nuclear weapons yet, while Pakistan does. Pakistan really is out of control. There have been multiple bombings there that have been linked to the Taliban and even Al Qaeda. Now, please tell me. What’s a bigger threat? Iran wanting nuclear weapons or Pakistan having nuclear weapons while unstable. On MSNBC.com they reported that there might be a state of emergency in Pakistan. It really doesn’t come close. Hopefully the media catches on to what Biden said and digs into that story a bit deeper.

Keep your eye out on the news. Pakistan seems to be falling apart.

Blog at WordPress.com.